Community health action
Clean air. Health first. No toxic dust.
⚠️ Community health, safety, and environmental justice

Stop the demolition until St. James Town is protected from toxic dust.

Residents are calling for an immediate pause on the planned pool and playground demolition until there is a real health and safety assessment, air-quality testing, and a transparent dust-control plan.

$1.8M+
Estimated minimum demolition and replacement cost described in the community briefing.
6–12+ months
Potential disruption timeline for demolition and reconstruction.
3,000+
Residents described as facing prolonged exposure to noise and dust impacts.
🚨
Why this matters
Health before demolition

Residents are asking decision-makers to pause the project until:

  • hazardous materials are properly assessed
  • baseline air monitoring is completed
  • a dust and noise protection plan is publicly shared
  • safer alternatives are seriously reviewed
Main concern
Toxic dust exposure
Community impact
Children, seniors, and daily pedestrians
St. James Town pool and community space
Community space at risk

This is the space residents are fighting to protect. The call is not to ignore community needs, but to stop demolition until real health protections, air-quality assessment, and safer alternatives are fully considered.

The issue

A demolition project should not move forward without protecting the people living next to it.

The message is simple: do not proceed with demolition that could release concrete dust, silica, paint residue, metal fragments, and rubber particulates into one of the city’s most densely populated communities without a credible health and safety process.

Dust from demolition near nearby homes
Dust from demolition can spread beyond the work zone, especially beside homes, walkways, and community spaces.
🫁

Respiratory risk

Residents are warning about airborne dust and particulates that could worsen asthma, irritate lungs, and threaten people with existing respiratory conditions.

πŸ‘₯

Vulnerable community

This site is surrounded by towers, walkways, shops, and daily foot traffic, meaning exposure would not be limited to a closed construction zone.

πŸ”Š

Daily disruption

The concern is not only dust. It is also prolonged noise, vibration, loss of access, and months of disruption beside homes and community spaces.

πŸ›‘οΈ

Process failures

Residents say the project should not continue without environmental review, community health protections, and clear public accountability.

What residents are asking for

Pause first. Assess the risks. Protect the community.

The request centers on specific, actionable demands that officials can act on right now.

βœ“
Halt the demolition until a comprehensive environmental and health impact assessment is completed.
βœ“
Complete baseline air-quality testing before any demolition work begins.
βœ“
Publish a detailed dust-control, monitoring, and notification plan with public reporting.
βœ“
Protect residents, workers, and nearby children with meaningful consultation and accessible communication.
βœ“
Review alternatives that reduce demolition, reduce waste, and avoid avoidable health harm.
A better path

The OASIS Foodhub greenhouse concept gives the community a safer alternative.

Instead of full demolition, community materials describe repurposing the existing structure into an aquaponic greenhouse and food hub that supports fresh food access, learning, community resilience, and no disruption.

No disruption

The greenhouse option is framed as shorter, more contained, and less dependent on heavy demolition.

More community value

The proposal emphasizes food security, youth learning, local jobs, and stronger year-round public benefit.

πŸ’§
Comparison snapshot
Demolition vs. adaptive reuse

Demolition plan

  • higher projected cost
  • longer disruption period
  • more dust, noise, and waste
  • loss of access to community space

OASIS alternative

  • lower estimated cost range
  • shorter fit-out timeline
  • reduced structural demolition
  • food and education benefits

πŸ“£ Core message

We deserve better than toxic dust. Protect the health of St. James Town residents first, and seriously consider a better alternative that serves the community instead of harming it.

Final call

Email decision-makers and ask them to pause the demolition.

Use the message on this page to ask for health protections, air-quality testing, dust monitoring, and a serious review of safer community-led alternatives before demolition proceeds.

Suggested contact
councillor_moise@toronto.ca

Update this section with the latest phone number, email list, petition link, or community meeting details.

Sample outreach message

Copy and send

Subject: Pause the St. James Town demolition until health protections are in place

Hello,

I am asking for an immediate pause on the planned pool and playground demolition in St. James Town until a full health and safety assessment is completed.

Residents deserve:
- a hazardous materials and environmental assessment
- baseline air-quality testing before any demolition begins
- a real dust-control and monitoring plan with public reporting
- meaningful consultation with residents in their languages
- serious review of safer alternatives, including the OASIS Foodhub greenhouse concept

This is a dense community with children, seniors, workers, and residents with respiratory conditions living and walking beside the site every day. Please protect the community before any demolition proceeds.

Thank you.